W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > January to March 2006

[Bug 3000] Allowing extensibility in its:documentRules

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:36:33 +0000
CC:
To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1FMRrV-0007Ho-Mt@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3000





------- Comment #10 from ysavourel@translate.com  2006-03-23 15:36 -------

> The generated schemas in the tagset draft are 
> *not* normative. Both the conformance sections on 
> schema conformance [...] and on processing expecations 
> [...] don't talk about the generated schemas. That is: 
> everybody is free to change them, or not to use them at 
> all.

OK. But I still think we should generate non-normative schemas that can be used
out of the box to allow extensions [if it's not too much work/change to do
that]. Most users will use the schemas as they are.

> ...
> Do you think we should have such an example in the spec?

I don't think it's needed. The paragraph about extension in section 1.3 seems
enough.

-ys
Received on Thursday, 23 March 2006 15:36:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:06 UTC