W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > January to March 2006

[Bug 3000] Allowing extensibility in its:documentRules

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 04:00:38 +0000
To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1FMH02-0000Wi-Kv@wiggum.w3.org>


------- Comment #5 from fsasaki@w3.org  2006-03-23 04:00 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> I wouldn't be in favor of creating additional elements for extension. Simply
> allowing non-ITS elements and attributes at certain levels should be enough.
> For example I would allow non-ITS attributes in each <its:zzzRule> element, and
> non-ITS elements in <its:documentRules>. And that would be it. How the
> extensions interact with ITS is the problem of the implementers of the
> extensions.
> It seems simpler that way.
> -ys
The question is whether we want to specify what can be extended, e.g. the
selection mechanism, the values etc. If we don't want to specify it, we don't
need additional elements, and I would take back my proposal.
So the question is: Do we want to specify what is being extended?
Received on Thursday, 23 March 2006 04:00:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:06 UTC