http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3000 ------- Comment #2 from ysavourel@translate.com 2006-03-22 16:37 ------- This issue (Bug #3000) is one of the topic for discussion this week (and decision at the Wed Mar-29 teleconference). Summary: We have decided (during the Sophia face-to-face I think) to address extensibility in ITS by simply letting users use their own namespaces. The question here is: - Do we need to have "extension points" (place where attributes and/or element of non-ITS namepsace are allowed) formally specified in our schemas? (so one can validate ITS markup). - And if so, where in <its:documentRules> and its children these extension points should be? -yvesReceived on Wednesday, 22 March 2006 16:37:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:12:46 GMT