W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > January to March 2006

[Bug 3000] Allowing extensibility in its:documentRules

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 16:37:21 +0000
To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1FM6Kn-0001KJ-CZ@wiggum.w3.org>


------- Comment #2 from ysavourel@translate.com  2006-03-22 16:37 -------

This issue (Bug #3000) is one of the topic for discussion this week (and
decision at the Wed Mar-29 teleconference).


We have decided (during the Sophia face-to-face I think) to address
extensibility in ITS by simply letting users use their own namespaces. The
question here is:

- Do we need to have "extension points" (place where attributes and/or element
of non-ITS namepsace are allowed) formally specified in our schemas? (so one
can validate ITS markup).

- And if so, where in <its:documentRules> and its children these extension
points should be?

Received on Wednesday, 22 March 2006 16:37:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:06 UTC