- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 11:54:59 +0900
- To: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Cc: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 16 March 2006 02:55:08 UTC
Hi Jirka, Jirka Kosek wrote: > Hi, > > I have written short article about mixing DocBook and ITS. It may be of > interest for you: > > http://xmlguru.cz/2006/03/docbook-and-its > > Jirka Thank you very much for the comments and the DocBook example! I saw you already started entering them in Bugzilla. Would you mind doing that for all of them? Here are some initial, personal replies: - [I don't think that attributes used inside documentRules element and its descendants should be prefixed. ] We need to prefix them if we want to allow for extensions, e.g. <its:documentRule its:translate="no" its:translateSelector="//db:para/@*" xyz:myExtension="http://www.example.com/someExtension"/> - [provided schema in RELAX NG uses bad naming conventions.] The schema is not normative, just an automatically generated example. I would have nothing against this change, though. Please enter this proposal into bugzilla. If you have further comments, please go on! However, we will republish the working draft soon (within the next weeks), so it might be better for you to wait. Best regards, Felix.
Received on Thursday, 16 March 2006 02:55:08 UTC