W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > January to March 2006

RE: On language tags

From: Lieske, Christian <christian.lieske@sap.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:27:33 +0100
Message-ID: <0F568FE519230641B5F84502E0979DD1049F7886@dewdfe12.wdf.sap.corp>
To: "Felix Sasaki" <fsasaki@w3.org>, <public-i18n-its@w3.org>

Hi,

I would be in favour since xml:lang is of great importance to i18n and
l10n.

Best regards,
Christian 

-----Original Message-----
From: public-i18n-its-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-i18n-its-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Felix Sasaki
Sent: Mittwoch, 22. Februar 2006 15:09
To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Subject: On language tags

Hi Yves, all,

Currently the language tags are only in the techniques document, and we
refer to xml:lang. I am just wondering if we should consider a language
attribute for the tagset document (not deciding yet whether for the last
call or not), to be able to use RFC 3066 bis. This new RFC for language
tags is much more powerful than the RFC 3066 (which is the basis for
xml:lang).

Any ideas?

Cheers,

Felix
Received on Monday, 27 February 2006 09:28:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:06 UTC