W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > January to March 2006

[Bug 2924] Why a closed list of schema languages?

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 09:33:16 +0000
To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Cc:
Message-Id: <E1FCCqa-0004mZ-Mt@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2924

           Summary: Why a closed list of schema languages?
           Product: ITS
           Version: WorkingDraft
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: ITS tagset
        AssignedTo: fsasaki@w3.org
        ReportedBy: vdv@dyomedea.com
         QAContact: public-i18n-its@w3.org


In the WD, it is mentioned that:

[Definition: Schema language refers in this specification to XML DTD, XML Schema
or RELAX NG.]

Do you need to provide a closed list of schema languages? You could define in
the spec how to use ITS with these three and still explicitely leave the option
of using ITS in other schema languages using the annotation mechanisms available
in these languages.

Eric
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2006 09:33:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:06 UTC