W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > January to March 2006

RE: [Bug 2878] Segmentation data category

From: Lieske, Christian <christian.lieske@sap.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:45:15 +0100
Message-ID: <0F568FE519230641B5F84502E0979DD10492F5F5@dewdfe12.wdf.sap.corp>
To: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>, <public-i18n-its@w3.org>

Sorry, this should have gone to the Bug related to the terminology data
category.

Best,
Christian 

-----Original Message-----
From: public-i18n-its-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-i18n-its-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Sent: Freitag, 17. Februar 2006 12:21
To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Subject: [Bug 2878] Segmentation data category


http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2878





------- Additional Comments From christian.lieske@sap.com  2006-02-17
11:20 -------
Continuing the Yomigana question ...

Should we recommend the use of Ruby instead? If so, which nesting do we 
recommend a specific type of nesting?

a.
 
<ruby>
   <rubyBase><term>PlateBroiler</term></rubyBase>
   <rubyText>ssss</rubyText>
</ruby>

b.

<ruby>
   <rubyBase>PlateBroiler</rubyBase>
   <term>PlateBroiler</term>
   <rubyText>ssss</rubyText>
</ruby>
Received on Friday, 17 February 2006 11:46:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:06 UTC