W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > January to March 2006

[Bug 2876] Need to address versioning

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 05:19:09 +0000
To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Cc:
Message-Id: <E1F9y1N-00027h-Og@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2876





------- Additional Comments From fsasaki@w3.org  2006-02-17 05:19 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> I'm wondering about using a version number in the namespace URI. There 
> certainly a few arguments against it.
> 
> There is an interesting post on that topic here:
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff-comment/200602/msg00001.html
> 
> One example it gives is XSLT which does not use version in its namespace URI, 
> but an attribute (http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#stylesheet-element). 
> 
> 

Sorry for not making this clear, but what I meant  in comment
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2876#c3 was not the namespace URI,
but the URI of the specification, e.g
/TR/ITS1 (version 1)
/TR/ITS2 (version 2)
/TR/ITS (latest version)
The namespace URI which we define at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060222/#d2e576 should be the same for all of
these.
Received on Friday, 17 February 2006 05:19:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:06 UTC