http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2876 ------- Additional Comments From fsasaki@w3.org 2006-02-17 05:19 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > I'm wondering about using a version number in the namespace URI. There > certainly a few arguments against it. > > There is an interesting post on that topic here: > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff-comment/200602/msg00001.html > > One example it gives is XSLT which does not use version in its namespace URI, > but an attribute (http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#stylesheet-element). > > Sorry for not making this clear, but what I meant in comment http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2876#c3 was not the namespace URI, but the URI of the specification, e.g /TR/ITS1 (version 1) /TR/ITS2 (version 2) /TR/ITS (latest version) The namespace URI which we define at http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060222/#d2e576 should be the same for all of these.Received on Friday, 17 February 2006 05:19:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:12:46 GMT