W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > January to March 2006

[Bug 2876] Need to address versioning

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:39:18 +0000
To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Cc:
Message-Id: <E1F9HFu-0005wJ-RY@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2876





------- Additional Comments From fsasaki@w3.org  2006-02-15 07:39 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Didn't we already discuss metadata like an attribute "version" (along the lines 
> of XSL or XML for example)? Of course deciding on how to represent versioning 
> information is only one part of the stories. Others may be:
> 
> 1. What's the version identifier we want to use in the last call?
> 2. Will we have minor and major releases? If so: What merits a major release?
> 3. Do we have make explicit statements about backwards compatibility?
> 
> Best regards,
> Christian

So far we are doing none of these. We have to tackle this before May 20 though ....
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2006 07:39:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:06 UTC