W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: Terminology to be used with ITS markup

From: Sebastian Rahtz <Sebastian.Rahtz@oucs.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:15:46 +0000
Message-ID: <43D4BAE2.3000504@oucs.ox.ac.uk>
To: "Lieske, Christian" <christian.lieske@sap.com>
CC: public-i18n-its@w3.org


> 1 = piggybacked/contingent (on host vocabulary) & ex situ ITS markup
> 2 = piggybacked/contingent (on host vocabulary) & in situ (in place) ITS
> markup
> 3 = autonomous ITS markup (neither data category nor selector in start
> tag of host vocabulary)
> 
> The contingent/autonomous distinction seems to be similar to CSS
> (contingent=style attribute; autonomous=style element).

"autonomous" for <its:documentRule> sems like a good word. As is
"contingent" for <p its:translate="no">. It's the
intermediate

  <body its:translate="no" its:translateSelector=".//p">

which is harder to describe. Perhaps use "contingent dislocated"
for that?
-- 
Sebastian Rahtz
Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

OSS Watch: JISC Open Source Advisory Service
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk
Received on Monday, 23 January 2006 11:16:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:06 UTC