W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > January to March 2006

[Bug 2621] On conformance levels: Have a simple conformance: in situ, with default selectors

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:45:25 +0000
To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Cc:
Message-Id: <E1Ex4dh-0003ZC-AU@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2621





------- Additional Comments From fsasaki@w3.org  2006-01-12 15:45 -------
I had a look at the conformance of xhtml 2, see
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-xhtml2-20050527/conformance.html#s_conform
There are only two levels: conformance to the markup definitins ("document
conformance"), and conformance to "xhtml family user agents". It then is defined
in detail how a user agent must behave. I am wondering if that would be useful
for us: Having just two conformance levels (1: markup conformance, 2: ITS
processing conformance), and defining for (2) in detail what it means - without
any optional features.
I think different from conformance is the question what kind of ITS information
occurs in a document, and for that purpose we could use an attribute like the
one Yves proposed in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JanMar/0016.html 
I would propose to use such an attribute *independently* of the conformance
discussion, and have only the two conformance levels mentioned.
Received on Thursday, 12 January 2006 15:45:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:06 UTC