W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > April to June 2006

[Bug 3287] Clarity of language in the abstract

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 09:29:03 +0000
CC:
To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1FfvrT-0002vi-9w@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3287





------- Comment #1 from fsasaki@w3.org  2006-05-16 09:29 -------
(In reply to comment #0)
> [[[
> Abstract
> 
> This document defines data categories and their implementation as a set of
> elements and attributes called the Internationalization Tag Set (ITS). ITS is
> designed to be used with schemas to support the internationalization and
> localization of schemas and documents. An implementation is provided for three
> schema languages: XML DTD, XML Schema and RELAX NG. The document provides
> examples of how ITS can be used with existing vocabularies. Feedback is
> especially appreciated on the general design of ITS, and on the design of the
> individual data categories.]]]
> 
> 
> I suggest to rewrite a bit this introduction.
> 
> “Internationlization Tag Set (ITS) defines data categories and their
> implementation as a set of elements and attributes. ITS is designed to be used
> with schemas to support the internationalization and localization of schemas
> and documents. Three implementations (XML DTD, XML Schema and RELAX NG) are
> provided and examples show how ITS can be used with existing vocabularies.”
> 
> Remove the part about the feedback, the status section is here for that.
> 
Many thanks for the comment, Karl! In the last call draft (to be published
soon), see
http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset-diff-20060414.html ,
we already changed the section. Are you o.k. with that?
Received on Tuesday, 16 May 2006 09:29:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:07 UTC