- From: Yves Savourel <yves@opentag.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:31:10 +0200
- To: "'Felix Sasaki'" <fsasaki@w3.org>, "'Lieske, Christian'" <christian.lieske@sap.com>
- Cc: <public-i18n-its@w3.org>
Hi Felix, all, > It seems that it was clear to Sebastian, only unclear to Yves > and me, so how about adding just one sentence to your proposal: > > <note> > The XPath expressions used by ITS selection assume that any inclusions > (such as those based on XInclude) are resolved before selection is > applied. Accordingly, inclusion mechanisms such as XInclude or DITA's > <gi>conref</gi> may need to be followed before ITS selections are > applied. </note> > > that is: > [[However, to avoid interoperability problems, the interpretation of > XPath expressions within the ITS selections MUST NOT require that > inclusion mechanisms are processed.]] But wouldn't this addition contradict the first sentence? If we assume inclusions are resolved it means we've probably processed them. I think we need to make clear to what info set the selection is applied to: it either includes or not the external references. [and IMO it does not]. -yves
Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2006 10:38:10 UTC