W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > April to June 2006

RE: Versioning

From: Lieske, Christian <christian.lieske@sap.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 16:26:15 +0200
Message-ID: <0F568FE519230641B5F84502E0979DD104DB05AE@dewdfe12.wdf.sap.corp>
To: "Felix Sasaki" <fsasaki@w3.org>
Cc: "Yves Savourel" <ysavourel@translate.com>, <public-i18n-its@w3.org>

Hello,

Please find my replies below.

Best,
Christian 

-----Original Message-----
From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org] 
Sent: Donnerstag, 6. April 2006 16:15
To: Lieske, Christian
Cc: Yves Savourel; public-i18n-its@w3.org
Subject: Re: Versioning

...
> I still see a need for a version attribute on the rules element
> (beneficial for example for linked rules files since those files
> otherwise would not have an indicator to which version they belong).

we decided to link via a xlink attribute which points to a file. If the
top element of that file has a version attribute, you will take the
version. If not, the version is the one indicated at the top element of
the including file.

Where is the problem / tricky case with this solution?

CL> The top-level elements of the file to which the xlink goes is
"rules", right?
CL> In that case, you would have/need the version element on "rules".
Received on Thursday, 6 April 2006 14:26:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:07 UTC