W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > April to June 2006

Comments on the specification (part 3)

From: Yves Savourel <yves@opentag.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 18:43:45 -0600
To: "Felix Sasaki" <fsasaki@w3.org>, "Christian Lieske" <christian.lieske@sap.com>
Cc: <public-i18n-its@w3.org>
Message-ID: <004501c656b7$aa4c2a40$0300a8c0@Breizh>

Hi felix, Christian, all,

Here are a few more comments:


===1: DTD for ITS:

There is a <?xml encoding="utf-8"?> at the top. If it's a normal XML declaration, shouldn't you have version="1.0" in addition to
the encoding?


===2: section 6.6.5:

Maybe breaking down the paragraph into two bullets (each with it's example0 would make it more readable?


===3: example 19:

It would be nice to have real bidi text for this example.


===4: section 5.1.2:

"Local selection of ITS information in instance documents is realized only with data category attributes. "

-> what about the its:span, or ruby: they use elements for local markup, not just attribute.

The link for "data category" is broken.

Shouldn't the link for "" go to the reference section, and from there to the specific refered part of the XPath document? Here it
goes directly to the XPath document.


===5: Examples 1, 2, and 3:

I strongly suggest to mark the translatable text with underline: bold is not clear enough in many set up.


===6: Abstract, first paragrap:

"This document defines data categories and their..." I suggest to have a link for "data categories" pointing to section 3.3 for the
definition.


That's all for now.
-yves
Received on Monday, 3 April 2006 00:44:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:07 UTC