W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > April to June 2005

[ESW Wiki] Update of "its0503ReqLangLocale" by fsasaki

From: <w3t-archive+esw-wiki@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 06:54:35 -0000
To: w3t-archive+esw-wiki@w3.org
Message-ID: <20050601065435.10970.69169@localhost.localdomain>
Dear Wiki user,

You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "ESW Wiki" for change notification.

The following page has been changed by fsasaki:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/its0503ReqLangLocale


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  subsets of the document needs a language/locale attribute. Such a local language/locale specification should be declared against an element or a span.  
  
  == Notes ==
- Currently there are several different standards for language/locale specifications, such as RFC 1766 [http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1766.txt] and RFC3066 [http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3066.txt]. XML 1.0 prescribes a langauge identification attribute "xml:lang" [http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#sec-lang-tag]/[http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-3e-errata]. ITS should carefully review these existing industry standards and clearly define what is a language/locale and its purpose in order to successfully meet this requirement.
+ Currently there are several different standards for language/locale specifications, such as RFC 1766 [http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1766.txt] and RFC3066 [http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3066.txt]. XML 1.0 prescribes a langauge identification attribute "xml:lang" [http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#sec-lang-tag]/[http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-3e-errata]. ITS should carefully review these existing industry standards and clearly define what is a language/locale and its purpose in order to successfully meet this requirement. '''[[FS''' You might want to add a reference to the locale data markup language, see [http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr35/]. ''']]''
- 
  == Quick Guideline Thoughts ==
  N/A
  
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2005 07:38:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:12:45 GMT