public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org from October 2014 by author

Dr. David Filip

• Re: [xliff] ITS: Preserve space and Language Information (Tuesday, 28 October)
• Re: [xliff] ITS: Preserve space and Language Information (Friday, 24 October)
• Re: [xliff] ITS: Preserve space and Language Information (Thursday, 23 October)
• Re: [xliff] ITS: Preserve space and Language Information (Thursday, 23 October)
• Re: [xliff] ITS: Preserve space and Language Information (Thursday, 23 October)
• Re: ITS Mapping Update - some inconsistencies found (Thursday, 9 October)
• Re: [xliff] ITS scope with sm/em (Thursday, 9 October)
• Re: [xliff] possible issue with URN prefixes used to define acceptable namespaces in XLIFF 2.1 (Tuesday, 7 October)

Estreen, Fredrik

• RE: [xliff] ITS scope with sm/em (Thursday, 9 October)
• RE: [xliff] ITS scope with sm/em (Wednesday, 8 October)
• RE: [xliff] possible issue with URN prefixes used to define acceptable namespaces in XLIFF 2.1 (Wednesday, 8 October)

Felix Sasaki

• Re: [xliff] ITS: Preserve space and Language Information (Tuesday, 28 October)
• Re: [xliff] ITS: Preserve space and Language Information (Tuesday, 28 October)
• Re: [xliff] ITS: Preserve space and Language Information (Tuesday, 28 October)
• [Minutes] ITS IG call 2014-10-20 (Monday, 20 October)
• late start (Monday, 20 October)
• [Agenda] ITS IG Call 20 October (today), 15:00 UTC (Monday, 20 October)
• Re: [xliff] ITS scope with sm/em (Tuesday, 14 October)
• Re: [xliff] ITS scope with sm/em (Monday, 13 October)
• Re: [xliff] ITS scope with sm/em (Sunday, 12 October)
• Re: [xliff] possible issue with URN prefixes used to define acceptable namespaces in XLIFF 2.1 (Friday, 10 October)
• Re: [xliff] ITS scope with sm/em (Thursday, 9 October)
• Re: [xliff] ITS scope with sm/em (Thursday, 9 October)
• Re: [xliff] possible issue with URN prefixes used to define acceptable namespaces in XLIFF 2.1 (Thursday, 9 October)
• Re: [xliff] ITS scope with sm/em (Thursday, 9 October)
• Re: ITS Mapping Update - some inconsistencies found (Thursday, 9 October)
• Re: [xliff] possible issue with URN prefixes used to define acceptable namespaces in XLIFF 2.1 (Wednesday, 8 October)

ITS IG Subset for Actions and Issues Issue Tracker

• ACTION-54: Try to come up with example of xliff+its test format / output (Monday, 20 October)
• ACTION-53: Work on overlap example and to do conversion (Monday, 20 October)

Phil Ritchie

• RE: [xliff] ITS scope with sm/em (Monday, 27 October)

Renat Bikmatov (Logrus.Net)

• RE: ITS Mapping Update - some inconsistencies found (Wednesday, 8 October)

Yves Savourel

• RE: [xliff] ITS: Preserve space and Language Information (Tuesday, 28 October)
• RE: [xliff] ITS: Preserve space and Language Information (Tuesday, 28 October)
• RE: [xliff] ITS: Preserve space and Language Information (Tuesday, 28 October)
• RE: [xliff] ITS: Preserve space and Language Information (Tuesday, 28 October)
• RE: [xliff] ITS: Preserve space and Language Information (Friday, 24 October)
• RE: [xliff] ITS: Preserve space and Language Information (Thursday, 23 October)
• ITS: Preserve space and Language Information (Thursday, 23 October)
• Provenance and Change Track Module (Monday, 20 October)
• RE: [xliff] ITS scope with sm/em (Monday, 20 October)
• RE: [xliff] ITS scope with sm/em (Monday, 13 October)
• RE: [xliff] ITS scope with sm/em (Sunday, 12 October)
• RE: [xliff] ITS scope with sm/em (Sunday, 12 October)
• ITS module implementation (Saturday, 11 October)
• RE: [xliff] possible issue with URN prefixes used to define acceptable namespaces in XLIFF 2.1 (Friday, 10 October)
• RE: [xliff] possible issue with URN prefixes used to define acceptable namespaces in XLIFF 2.1 (Friday, 10 October)
• RE: [xliff] ITS scope with sm/em (Thursday, 9 October)
• RE: [xliff] ITS scope with sm/em (Thursday, 9 October)
• RE: [xliff] possible issue with URN prefixes used to define acceptable namespaces in XLIFF 2.1 (Thursday, 9 October)
• RE: [xliff] ITS scope with sm/em (Thursday, 9 October)
• RE: ITS Mapping Update - some inconsistencies found (Wednesday, 8 October)
• ITS scope with sm/em (Wednesday, 8 October)
• RE: [xliff] possible issue with URN prefixes used to define acceptable namespaces in XLIFF 2.1 (Wednesday, 8 October)
• RE: [xliff] possible issue with URN prefixes used to define acceptable namespaces in XLIFF 2.1 (Tuesday, 7 October)
• RE: [xliff] possible issue with URN prefixes used to define acceptable namespaces in XLIFF 2.1 (Tuesday, 7 October)

Last message date: Tuesday, 28 October 2014 23:45:14 UTC