Re: ITS Mapping Update - some inconsistencies found

Am 08.10.2014 um 23:39 schrieb Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>:

> Hi Renat,
> 
> Thanks a lot for those good notes.

+1!

- Felix


> We'll make sure to incorporate the fixes as we move the description to the XLIFF module specification.
> 
> Cheers,
> -ys
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Renat Bikmatov (Logrus.Net) [mailto:renat.bikmatov@logrus.net] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2014 11:59 AM
> To: Felix Sasaki; Yves Savourel
> Cc: public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org
> Subject: RE: ITS Mapping Update - some inconsistencies found
> 
> Hi Felix, Yves, and All,
> 
> Please find attached the copy of mapping specification with our comments [SN] added on possible inconsistencies.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Renat Bikmatov | IT and Localization Solutions Architect | Senior Localization Project Manager | +7 (495) 646-3564, ext. 110
> www.logrus.net
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org]
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 9:35 AM
> To: Renat Bikmatov (Logrus.Net)
> Cc: Yves Savourel; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org; public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org
> Subject: Re: ITS Mapping Update - What is the plan?
> 
> Hi Renat,
> 
> Am 21.08.2014 um 20:39 schrieb Renat Bikmatov (Logrus.Net) <renat.bikmatov@logrus.net>:
> 
>> Hi Yves,
>> 
>> We are considering to further develop our ITS 2.0 implementation project aimed at visualization of content and ITS metadata - this
> time for XLIFF 2.0 content. I asked the developer to look at the ITS 2.0 mapping schema for XLIFF 2.0
> (http://www.w3.org/International/its/wiki/XLIFF_2.0_Mapping), and he has found several inconsistences and/or omissions. So my
> question is:
>> 
>> Do you think it is worth for us to participate in further development and debugging of the current ITS-to-XLIFF 2.0 mapping
> specification (if this is still in progress) - OR- Does it make sense to wait until ITS 2.0 is implemented as XLIFF 2.x Module
> (hopefully, in near future)?
> 
> 
> Yves may have a different answer, here is mine: the mapping is being developed in the wiki and nothing else has happened in XLIFF TC
> about it. So it would make a lot of sense to know about the inconsistencies and omissions here before the mapping is finalized.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Felix
> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Renat Bikmatov | IT and Localization Solutions Architect | Senior 
>> Localization Project Manager | +7 (495) 646-3564, ext. 110
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Yves Savourel [mailto:ysavourel@enlaso.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 5:48 PM
>> To: public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org
>> Cc: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
>> Subject: ITS Mapping Update
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> (CCing the XLIFF TC for information, as the idea is to make this into 
>> a module)
>> 
>> An update on the ITS mapping for XLIFF 2:
>> 
>> As discussed in Dublin last month and in this morning ITS-IG call, we are looking at classifying the ITS data categories into
> several classes:
>> 
>> - the one for which there is a direct XLIFF mapping (so nothing to 
>> implement),
>> - the ones partially covered in XLIFF,
>> - the ones without equivalent in XLIFF
>> - the ones that are not metadata (and therefore not really to be 
>> 'mapped')
>> - and several ones not mapped yet
>> 
>> The latest draft is here:
>> https://www.w3.org/International/its/wiki/XLIFF_2.0_Mapping
>> 
>> Feedback and suggestions welcome, especially on the data categories not mapped yet, like Directionality, Storage Size, etc.
>> 
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> -yves
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 9 October 2014 02:51:52 UTC