- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 16:20:10 +0200
- To: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Cc: public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org
Sure - sorry for being unclear. I should have asked: could one contribute to implementations via unit test processing tools? Or would you say that the CSS WG is not likely to take such implementations into account? - Felix Am 10.06.2014 um 10:58 schrieb Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>: > On 9.6.2014 21:45, Felix Sasaki wrote: > >> The draft looks good to me. One question: what would implementing mean, e.g. in terms of contributing to testing? Would unit tests like in the ITS2 test suite be sufficient? > > Honestly, I haven't been thinking about tests yet. It's probably too > early to collect test as there are no implementations yet. > > Jirka > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Professional XML consulting and training services > DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 rep. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Bringing you XML Prague conference http://xmlprague.cz > ------------------------------------------------------------------ >
Received on Tuesday, 10 June 2014 14:20:40 UTC