[All] ITS IG (topics)

Hi all,

looking at yesterday's IG / MLW-LT WG minutes
http://www.w3.org/2013/07/17-mlw-lt-minutes.html#item04
I saw this bis
[
<daveL> arle: last week there was a call on how to address the MQM topic
<daveL> ... two separable issue to be addressed
<daveL> ... one is the mapping between MQM and LQI issue categories
<daveL> .. this is fairly well solved with an exisitng mapping, though 
with some info lost in both directions
<daveL> .. these can be dealt with in IG and documents
<daveL> ... second issue is how to maintain the MQM work beyond the 
lifespan of the supporting project (QT-launchpad)
<daveL> ... two possible homes are CRISP as GALA, or ITS IG
<daveL> .. concensus in call was initially to do it in CRISP, but 
subsequently, GALA expressed preference to run it under ITS IG, led by 
DFKI initially
]

This may need some clarification. Arle, Serge, Aljoscha and I had a mail 
thread last week with this outcome:

[
1) "Discuss the MQM model in CRISP"
2) "Discuss the ITS/MQM integration in the ITS Interest Group". We do 
that already.
The main outcome of 1) is input to 2). Very concrete: how to write or 
"store" MQM based on ITS 2. Question 2) is really an implementer 
question, so it makes sense to discuss it in a mostly technical form (=W3C).
]

So Arle: please do not add an MQM product to the ITS IG tracker. Before 
moving on with the mapping we should have MQM setup itself in gala / 
crisp, and have more information about that - is that available?

Also, at all, about other topics: we have these topics
http://www.w3.org/International/its/wiki/Main_Page#Work_items.2C_issues.2C_actions
in the ITS IG. The main item with a time line is the XLIFF 1.2 mapping  
- at the moment nothing else. If you want the IG to spend time on "your" 
topic please speak up. The topics without a timeline should be clearly 
identified as well (see the wiki) - but having no timeline of course 
will lead to no clear outcome.

Best,

Felix

Received on Thursday, 18 July 2013 07:54:31 UTC