Re: ACTION-515: language tag in ITS ontology

Am 09.07.13 17:18, schrieb Dave Lewis:
> [moving to ITS IG list]
>
> I had second thoughts on 'domain' needing language tag. I forgot the 
> attribute is 'domains' and can be the result of processing the 
> domainMapping attribute and may contain several domain names. As i 
> result i can't see any way one could _ensure_ the text in the 
> attribute would all be in the same language (especially as the mapping 
> may bridge between the client's domain terminology on one language and 
> and LSP's  in another).
>
> So I suggest we drop 'domains' as an RDF attribute that needs a 
> language tag, and stick just with 'locNote' and 'LocQualityIssueComment'.
>
> any thoughts - Felix, Sebastien?

Fine by me.

Best,

Felix
>
> cheers,
> Dave
>
> On 18/06/2013 16:53, Dave Lewis wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> With refernece to the ITS ontolog at:
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its/rdf-content/its-rdf.html#
>>
>> I think the following string attributes would benefit from having a 
>> language tag:
>>
>> 1) locNote
>> 2) locQualityIssueComment
>> 3) domain
>>
>> I considered it for proveance: person, tool, org, revPerson, revTool, 
>> revOrg
>> but there was no obvious benefit as far as I can see.
>>
>> thoughts?
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>