Re: PLS 1.0 PR comment

Thank you, Paolo, I accept your resolution. Thank you very much for your 
efforts, and I wish you the best for the Recommendation.

Felix

Baggia Paolo さんは書きました:
> Dear Felix,
>
> Thank you for your comment.
>
> Resolution:  Accepted
>
> Explanation:  We agree with you and have decided to adjust our
> schemas to allow attributes from non-PLS namespaces to occur on all
> PLS 1.0 elements. Many thanks for helping us to update the PLS 1.0
> Schemas.
>
> If you accept our resolution to your request, can you please reply
> indicating that you accept our resolutions?
> If we do not hear from you within one week of today we will assume
> that you have accepted our resolution.
>
> Paolo Baggia
> PLS 1.0 Editor
> Voice Browser Working Group
>
> =====================================
> From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
> Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 15:48:23 +0900
> Message-ID: <48C61C37.8080601@w3.org>
> To: www-voice@w3.org
> CC: public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org
>
> Hello Voice Browser Working Group,
>
> this is a personal comment on the PLS 1.0 Proposed Recommendation draft
> [1] which is based on a discussion within the ITS Interest Group [2].
>
> There is no general attribute extensibility in the PLS 1.0 schema [3].
> You need something like
> <attribute>
> <anyName>
> <except>
> <nsName ns="http://www.w3.org/2005/01/pronunciation-lexicon"/>
> </except>
> </anyName>
> </attribute>
> at each element declaration.
>
> One reason for this proposal: Your conformance statement at [4] says:
>
> "When a Conforming Pronunciation Lexicon Specification Processor
> encounters elements or attributes that are not declared in this
> specification and such elements or attributes occur where it is not
> forbidden in this specification, the processor /MAY/ choose to:
>
>     * ignore the non-standard elements and/or attributes
>     * or, process the non-standard elements and/or attributes
>     * or, reject the document containing those elements and/or attributes"
>
> However, with the PLS schema at [3], it is not possible to create PLS
> documents for processors which want to choose the first two options.
>
> Another reason for this comment: We stumbled across this issue when we
> discussed applicability of ITS 1.0 [5] in PLS 1.0. For vocabularies like
> ITS 1.0 it is important that a "host vocabulary" like PLS 1.0 allows
> embedding of ITS 1.0 markup easily. Without the attribute extensibility
> this is rather difficult.
>
> Note that I personally do not think that this is a normative change to
> your specification, since it does not change the behavior of an PLS 1.0
> processor, but rather the possibilities of non- PLS 1.0 implements who
> want to do non- PLS 1.0 processing with PLS 1.0 documents.
>
> Regards, Felix
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PR-pronunciation-lexicon-20080818/
> [2] See
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its-ig/2008Sep/0003.html
> and
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its-ig/2008Sep/0004.html
> [3] |http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PR-pronunciation-lexicon-20080818/pls.rng
> [4] |http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PR-pronunciation-lexicon-20080818/#S3.2.2
> [5] http://www.w3.org/TR/its/
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2008 14:44:29 UTC