W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org > October 2008

Re: decorator tests

From: Camille Bégnis <camille@neodoc.biz>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:53:04 +0100
Message-ID: <49074370.8040200@neodoc.biz>
To: public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org

just sending the attachments so others can test the docbook decoration.


Camille Bgnis wrote:
> Hello,
> I have finally been tested the decorator batch archive, and it looks to
> work fine with the provided example.
> I have a question though: as a result the initial file is added the
> itstve and itstva attributes which makes that result to not respect the
> initial schema. I guess this is fine if we just want to extract the
> strings afterwards, but why not adding those in a specific namespace?
> I have then tested the decorator on a simple DocBook document with the
> rules available at
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-i18n-bp/#relating-docbook-plus-its
> by running:
> ./run-saxon.sh DocBookSample.xml ex-relating-docbook-plus-its-1.xml
> It works fine but the <command> tag is set as translatable while it
> isn't. As a matter of fact the resulting rules.xml is empty. What did I
> miss?
> I attach the files to this email.
> Then a final question: what is the next step after one has the decorated
> file?
> Camille.
> P.S.1: The link at the bottom of
> http://www.w3.org/International/its/wiki/ITS_Translate_Decorator links
> to xsltproc instead of saxon
> P.S.2: the root element of example/external.xml should not be <rules> ?

Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2008 16:53:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:11:27 UTC