W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org > December 2008

Re: Action item: reviewing POWDER

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 20:21:40 +0900
Message-ID: <49439AC4.6050307@w3.org>
To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@translate.com>
CC: public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org

  Hi Yves, all,

this looks good, many thanks! I'd propose you go ahead and contact the 
powder folks, if nobody protests here.

Felix

Yves Savourel さんは書きました:
> I had the action item of lloking at POWDER for ITS-related issues.
>
> The document is here: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-powder-dr-20081114/.
>
> POWDER can have text content as specified here:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-powder-dr-20081114/#tags
>
> The definition for those text containing elements (tag, comment, label, etc.) (http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-powder-dr-20081114/#tag)
> does not seem to include any provsion for localization/language-related information. The schema for
> http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder, does not include those elements, so I'm not sure if it's the proper version.
>
>
> I would propose to recommend the two things:
>
> A) Suggest to the POWDER WG to add a small appendix where the ITS rules for POWDER would be defined. Looking at the specification it
> could be something like this:
>
> Appendix: Localization
>
> Textual content of POWDER documents may be subject to linguistic-related processes, such as translation, spell-checking, etc.
>
> The W3C Internationalization Tag Set provides a way to define what parts of the document has textual content, using a rules
> document. A possible ITS rules document for POWDER would indicate that only the of the elements tag, label and comment have textual
> content.
>
> <its:rules version="1.0"
>  xmlns:its="http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its"
>  xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder">
>  <its:translateRule translate="no" selector="//p:powder"/>
>  <its:translateRule translate="yes" selector="//p:tag|//p:label|//p:comment"/>
> </its:rules>
>
>
> B) Request more information on how tag, comment and label are defined in the schema, so we can see if ITS attributes would be
> allowed or not.
>
>
> Any other ideas?
> -yves
>
>
>   
Received on Saturday, 13 December 2008 11:22:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:00 GMT