W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-geo@w3.org > March 2007

RE: Best Practise doc ready for publication?

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 09:33:12 -0000
To: "'Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG'" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>, "'GEO'" <public-i18n-geo@w3.org>
Cc: <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00f601c76552$9f916ca0$6501a8c0@rishida>

Hi Roberto,

It's already listed in the sources (grey box just after the discussion).  I couldn't see a place where it was needed in the howto or discussion text.

Thanks,
RI

============
Richard Ishida
Internationalization Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)
 
http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/
http://www.w3.org/International/
http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/
 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG [mailto:rscano@iwa-italy.org] 
> Sent: 20 February 2007 17:03
> To: Richard Ishida; GEO
> Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Best Practise doc ready for publication?
> 
> Hi Richard,
> only a note.
> 
> 
> for this:
> http://www.w3.org/International/geo/html-tech/tech-lang.html#r
i20040429.092928424
> 
> For HTML use the lang attribute only, for XHTML 1.0 served as 
> text/html use the lang and xml:lang attributes, and for XHTML 
> served as XML use the xml:lang attribute only.
> 
> 
> I suggest also to put a reference to the official  XHTML 1.0 SE spec.
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#C_7
> 
> Use both the lang and xml:lang attributes when specifying the 
> language of an element. The value of the xml:lang attribute 
> takes precedence.
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Richard Ishida" <ishida@w3.org>
> To: "GEO" <public-i18n-geo@w3.org>
> Cc: <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 5:32 PM
> Subject: Best Practise doc ready for publication?
> 
> 
> 
> Chaps,
> 
> I worked some more on the document
> 
> Internationalization Best Practices: Specifying Language in 
> XHTML & HTML 
> Content
> http://www.w3.org/International/geo/html-tech/tech-lang.html
> 
> and its related tests and results pages, over the past week, 
> and I think it 
> is ready for publication as a WG Note.  The decision to 
> publish will now 
> have to be taken by the recharted Core WG, but please could 
> you take a look 
> at this before the telecon tomorrow and let me know whether 
> you are in 
> agreement that it can be published?
> 
> Thanks,
> RI
> 
> 
> ============
> Richard Ishida
> Internationalization Lead
> W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)
> 
> http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/
> http://www.w3.org/International/
> http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/
> 
> 
> -- 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.3/693 - Release 
> Date: 19/02/2007 
> 17:01
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.2/692 - Release 
> Date: 18/02/2007 
> 16.35
> 
> 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.10/720 - Release Date: 12/03/2007 19:19
 
Received on Tuesday, 13 March 2007 09:33:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:04 UTC