W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-geo@w3.org > January 2005

RE: "document processing language" -> "text processing language"

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:10:46 -0000
To: "'Martin Duerst'" <duerst@w3.org>, <public-i18n-geo@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20050119111045.BD7C14F181@homer.w3.org>

Thanks for noticing this, Martin.  This FAQ was an early attempt to expound
these ideas. We then improved the explanations in the techniques document.
I think we should now review the FAQ with a view to bring it in line with
what's currently in the techniques doc.


Richard Ishida

contact info:

W3C Internationalization:

Publication blog:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-i18n-geo-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-i18n-geo-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Martin Duerst
> Sent: 19 January 2005 05:45
> To: public-i18n-geo@w3.org
> Subject: "document processing language" -> "text processing language"
> Dear GEOers,
> I just had a look at
> http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-http-and-lang,
> where the term "document processing language". It sounds to 
> me as if it where better to change this to "text processing 
> language". My guess is that this is closer to the meaning 
> that you actually indend, and produces less confusing (i.e. 
> not letting people think that it has to be the language of a 
> whole document).
> Regards,    Martin. 
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2005 11:10:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:02 UTC