W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-geo@w3.org > August 2005

Re: Getting Started structure

From: Molly Holzschlag <molly@molly.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 18:35:16 -0700
To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, GEO <public-i18n-geo@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BF253F64.5053%molly@molly.com>

Richard, GEO,

It seems to me that option three is really just the interface for option two
with some of option one combined. It's a good idea in theory, but I'm having
real trouble visualizing how this might work without becoming entirely too
cluttered.

I have no idea regarding the way W3C works in terms of servers, etc., but to
address your automation and be able to include tagging / categories there's
this little thing called blog software that does all this automagically. Not
to mention that using a blog could really get us a lot of traffic as we'd be
able to really *outreach*.

>-    creating or tweaking html/xhtml code (ie. content authoring) - for
>articles dealing with charset or lang declaration this rolls together people
>who are using tools or not, and people who are developing scripts to generate
>code

Suggest: "document authors" or "markup specialists"

>-    authoring content (this is a tricky one, since for our current set of
>articles it really relates to creating or tweaking the html/xhtml code - even
>people who use wysiwyg tools

Suggest: "markup and design specialist"

Food for thought!
Molly :)


Molly E. Holzschlag
Author / Instructor / Web Designer
About Me: http://www.molly.com/
About Web Standards: http://www.webstandards.org/
About W3C GEO Working Group: http://www.w3.org/International/geo/


> From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:54:03 +0100
> To: GEO <public-i18n-geo@w3.org>
> Subject: Getting Started structure
> Resent-From: <public-i18n-geo@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:54:11 +0000
> 
> .
Received on Monday, 15 August 2005 01:35:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:03 UTC