Re: glossary

I think you meant:

http://www.w3.org/glossary

looks interesting.

Also worth looking at
http://www.w3.org/QA/glossary

thanks
tex

Tex Texin wrote:
> 
> Is the link correct? I get an error accessing it.
> 
> Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> >
> > * Tex Texin wrote:
> > >I am not sure about terms like "quirks mode".
> > >Also, if define terms like HTTP Header and XML declaration, we will be defining
> > >lots of terms from many many specs.
> > >
> > >We need a criteria for what is included or not.
> > >I wonder if we need a search index rather than a glossary, so people can easily
> > >find where things are defined or discussed rather than a glossary for some of
> > >the items.
> >
> > Like <http://www.w3.org/2003/glossary/>?
> 
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Tex Texin   cell: +1 781 789 1898   mailto:Tex@XenCraft.com
> Xen Master                          http://www.i18nGuy.com
> 
> XenCraft                            http://www.XenCraft.com
> Making e-Business Work Around the World
> -------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------
Tex Texin   cell: +1 781 789 1898   mailto:Tex@XenCraft.com
Xen Master                          http://www.i18nGuy.com
                         
XenCraft		            http://www.XenCraft.com
Making e-Business Work Around the World
-------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Monday, 3 May 2004 15:23:14 UTC