- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 17:45:41 -0400
- To: Jungshik Shin <jshin@i18nl10n.com>, Tex Texin <tex@i18nguy.com>
- Cc: public-i18n-geo@w3.org
At 18:21 03/10/24 +0900, Jungshik Shin wrote: >For example, my feedback (and my brother's) on Korean fonts (the one >given as sans-serif is actually 'serif-like' while the one listed as >serif is sans-serif) hasn't been acted on. Perhaps, we can make a more >comprehensive list by merging Richard's (that probably includes that >of CSS1), Mozilla's and other source (I'm familar with what fonts are >shipped by various linux distributions). Tex/Junshik - Can we make sure that we can add this to the CSS 2.1 review? There are also mistakes in the Japanese examples, the font "Kyokasho ICA" (or anything being named "Kyokasho"), although having serifs, isn't suitable as a generic serif font because it's a special style used for schoolbooks, which would look strange on other material. Actually, it looks from http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/fonts.html that all this is info is gone. Is that what we want? Regards, Martin.
Received on Sunday, 26 October 2003 21:51:32 UTC