RE: Overlay illustration

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tex Texin [mailto:tex@i18nguy.com] 
> Sent: 15 January 2003 15:51
> To: ishida@w3.org; GEO
> Subject: Re: Overlay illustration
> 
> 
> looks very good. Consider making the year 2003.
Ah, good point

> Should we have a glossary section within the document or 
> perhaps another doc as glossary that we link to?

Let's hold fire on this for now, since the W3C are talking about
possibly having a centralised glossary.  I would say another doc, in any
case, if only to reduce maintenance.

> 
> Should we standardize/standardise spellings?
Yup/yep

> 
> On META statements, I think references should be to "META 
> CONTENT-TYPE" statements not "META" statements. Saying "META" 
> should be early as possible is meaningless... It's the 
> charset that needs to be early. Or perhaps they should be 
> called "CONTENT-TYPE" statements or "CONTENT-TYPE" META statements?
Or "Use encoding declarations as early as possible" ?

> 
> tex
> 
> 
> Richard Ishida wrote:
> > 
> > Chaps,
> > 
> > I have knocked up a very quick illustration (attached) to help me 
> > discuss the idea of overlays during today's meeting.  Please try to 
> > have access to this during the meeting.
> > 
> > RI
> > 
> > ============
> > Richard Ishida
> > W3C
> > 
> > tel: +44 1753 480 292
> > http://www.w3.org/International/ http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/
> > 
> >   
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> >                                Name: page-header-overlay.html
> >    page-header-overlay.html    Type: Hypertext Markup 
> Language (text/html)
> >                            Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
> -- 
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Tex Texin   cell: +1 781 789 1898   mailto:Tex@XenCraft.com
> Xen Master                          http://www.i18nGuy.com
>                          
> XenCraft		            http://www.XenCraft.com
> Making e-Business Work Around the World
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>

Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2003 11:39:24 UTC