W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-geo@w3.org > December 2002

Re: GEO FTF meetings - please respond asap

From: Andrew Cunningham <andrewc@mail.vicnet.net.au>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:53:29 +1100
Message-ID: <3DFD6A59.8080401@mail.vicnet.net.au>
To: ishida@w3.org
Cc: public-i18n-geo@w3.org

Hi Richard,

Richard Ishida wrote:

>
>1] Does it still make sense to have a separate FTF at Microsoft, given the Tech Plenary in Boston in March?
>  
>
My first reaction is that it wouldn't make much sense to have two FTF's 
close together. But on second thoughts it might provide a timeframe for 
us to work towards if we had clearly identified milestones or tasks for 
each FTF.

But its academic to me in a sense, since I could only attend either in a 
virtual sense, by teleconference or videoconferencing.

>2] Who would like to hold a meeting during the Tech Plenary?
>
>3] Who would like to hold a meeting at the IUC in Prague?
>
>4] If we do hold a meeting at Microsoft before the Tech Plenary, is the timing right, or should we move it into February.
>  
>
Really depends on whether we can get through enough material to make the 
Microsoft FTF worthwhile. I suspect that a FTF at Microsoft and Boston 
may be too close to get any real benefit from the second FTF, unless 
we're quite focused. Depends onhow much we can work through between the 
two FtF's within the context of our other commitments.

Andrew

Andrew Cunningham
Multilingual Technical Officer
Online Porjects Team, Vicnet
State Library of Victoria
Australia

andrewc@vicnet.net.au
Received on Monday, 16 December 2002 00:53:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:12:36 GMT