- From: Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
- Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 12:56:08 -0400
- To: Andrew Cunningham <andrewc@vicnet.net.au>
- Cc: Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@dfki.de>, duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, public-xg-lld@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Hi Andrew, On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 12:36:02PM +1000, Andrew Cunningham wrote: > Being in both Library and i18n camps, I'd stress the important of > referencing IRIs. I see your point but don't see an easy way of doing this without changing the whole emphasis in the report on "URIs" (e.g., a global search and replace "s/URIs/IRIs/"?). Emphasizing IRIs would put us out of synch with the five-star coffee cup message of Linked Data generally. Making the reference prominently in the Scope section will get readers' attention. If the Linked Data message is wrong to emphasize URIs (and not IRIs) _generally_, then maybe we need a revised coffee cup message... Does that make sense? Tom [1] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html -- Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Received on Friday, 9 September 2011 16:57:06 UTC