W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-core@w3.org > July to September 2011

[Bug 10830] i18n comment : Please add support for rb

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 01:20:04 +0000
To: public-i18n-core@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1QvJBM-0006UZ-3M@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10830

--- Comment #33 from Murata <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp> 2011-08-22 01:19:59 UTC ---
> Completely broken code is a good description of 99% of the web. But sure, try..

I do not understand your argument.  Why can behaviour for 
broken code be a reason to drop rb?  

"HTML Working Group Decision Policy" document" has a para 
shown below:

  I strongly think that "If the commenter is dissatisfied with the 
  resolution and does not believe it is productive to ask the editor
  to reconsider, he or she may ask to escalate the issue to the issue tracker.
"

I would like to request the WG to consider (1) dropping dt of 
dl, (2) introducing rb, and (3) providing convincing argument 
for keeping dt whild turning down rb in spite of repeated 
requests from I18N and Japan.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Monday, 22 August 2011 01:21:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 22 August 2011 01:22:10 GMT