W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-core@w3.org > July to September 2011

RE: We are a bit late...

From: Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 22:43:51 -0700
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
CC: "Paul Cotton (Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com)" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "sam@intertwingingly.net" <sam@intertwingingly.net>, "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Message-ID: <131F80DEA635F044946897AFDA9AC3476A94D19A6B@EX-SEA31-D.ant.amazon.com>
Hi Maciej,

Thanks. We'll do our best to get everything in by the deadline and update as needed. This may even result in closing some comments ;-).

Point of order: is it okay to create new subsidiary bugs? I personally find "expansive" bugs to be something to avoid.

Addison

(I know, I know... everybody wants an extension.....)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maciej Stachowiak [mailto:mjs@apple.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 10:31 PM
> To: Phillips, Addison
> Cc: Paul Cotton (Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com); sam@intertwingingly.net;
> public-i18n-core@w3.org
> Subject: Re: We are a bit late...
> 
> 
> On Aug 2, 2011, at 8:40 PM, Phillips, Addison wrote:
> 
> > Dear HTML chairs,
> >
> > I'm writing on behalf of the I18N Core WG.
> >
> > We're late on Last Call. This week, no doubt you've noticed, Richard Ishida
> filed the various issues we have found during our Last Call review of HTML5.
> We have, I believe, entered all of the issues from our own tracker. Some of
> these, however, are provisional, not having been reviewed at the WG level. We
> would like to beg your indulgence. Many of us are on vacation.
> >
> > We would like an additional two weeks to review our comments internally.
> We are filing our comments in your bugzilla, so they may all be filed prior to
> your LC end. But we hope you won't mind if we modify, add, or redact some
> post your deadline? I don't believe we will have a significant number to add.
> >
> > Please let us know how best to ensure that our comments reach you and
> considered within the rubric of LC.
> 
> As long as the bugs are filed before the LC deadline is over, it is fine to add
> additional information to the bugs after that point.
> 
> Regards,
> Maciej

Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2011 05:44:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 3 August 2011 05:44:31 GMT