W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-core@w3.org > January to March 2011

RE: process question and query about ISSUE-88

From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 04:52:54 +0000
To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>
CC: "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>, "Sam Ruby (rubys@intertwingly.net)" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "Maciej Stachowiak (mjs@apple.com)" <mjs@apple.com>, "Michael(tm) Smith (mike@w3.org)" <mike@w3.org>
Message-ID: <E3EACD022300B94D88613639CF4E25F8186E7901@TK5EX14MBXC138.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
> Recently (a few weeks ago, actually), our WG reopened a few bugs filed before your cutoff date. We would like to know how these will be handled, etc. That is: what is your process for clearing our open bugs?

Can you help us here by explicitly listing the bugs you re-opened?

Please note that the Jan 22 deadline was for the escalation of bugs into WG issues.  See: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Sep/0074.html 

> - Jan 22, 2010 - cutoff for escalating bugs for pre-LC consideration - all issues in tracker, calls for proposal issued by this date
> Consequences of missing this date: any further escalations will be treated as a Last Call comment.

Was your intent to convert the re-opened bugs in WG Issues to ensure they were handled before Last Call?

/paulc

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329


-----Original Message-----
From: Phillips, Addison [mailto:addison@lab126.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 11:48 AM
To: Paul Cotton; Sam Ruby (rubys@intertwingly.net); Maciej Stachowiak (mjs@apple.com); Michael(tm) Smith (mike@w3.org)
Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org
Subject: process question and query about ISSUE-88

Dear HTML5 WG chairs,

I have been tasked [1][2] by the Internationalization WG with touching base with you about two topics.

1. Recently (a few weeks ago, actually), our WG reopened a few bugs filed before your cutoff date. We would like to know how these will be handled, etc. That is: what is your process for clearing our open bugs? 

2. We noticed also that ISSUE-88 seems to have gone dormant and are wondering about the status of this issue. There is no recent update on http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html. Is any progress being made there.

Thanks,

Addison

[1] http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/16 ACTION-16 [2] http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/19 ACTION-19

Addison Phillips
Globalization Architect (Lab126)
Chair (W3C I18N, IETF IRI WGs)

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.
Received on Thursday, 10 February 2011 05:46:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 10 February 2011 05:46:42 GMT