W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-core@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: Update on I18n-ISSUE-2: Why not using xml:lang?

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 08:30:06 +0100
Message-ID: <4DE73BFE.2080902@w3.org>
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
CC: public-i18n-core@w3.org, www-font@w3.org
On 02/06/2011 08:28, Richard Ishida wrote:
> PS: One personal comment: I noticed just now that when you hover over
>
> "The text elements MAY be given a lang attribute in the XML namespace
> [XML]."
>
> the highlighting covers only
>
> "The text elements MAY be given a lang attribute"
>
> I think it may lead to fewer mistakes on the part of the reader if you
> highlight the whole sentence, since the XML namespace part is crucial.


Also, there is no highlighting on the conformance criteria in the rest 
of that paragraph or the following one.  Presumably this is an oversight.

RI



-- 
Richard Ishida
Internationalization Activity Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)

http://www.w3.org/International/
http://rishida.net/
Received on Thursday, 2 June 2011 07:32:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 2 June 2011 07:32:31 GMT