W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-core@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: draft agenda for IRI working group BOF, and draft charter for IRI

From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:55:08 +0900
Message-ID: <4ACF168C.5060801@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
CC: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@amazon.com>, "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, "Lisa Dusseault (lisa.dusseault@gmail.com)" <lisa.dusseault@gmail.com>
Hello Larry, Addison, others,

On 2009/09/24 13:51, Larry Masinter wrote:
> Almost all of the work needed at this point has little
> to do with internationalization,

While I very much agree that this is a valid point in the current 
situation, I also think that some care is necessary. 
Internationalization expertise will still be needed to make sure that 
the core I18N functionality in IRIs isn't affected/damaged by other 
concerns such as those mentioned below, and to help explain features and 
issues to participants on a potential WG with limited I18N knowledge. So 
please don't feel excluded, quite to the contrary.

Regards,    Martin.

> and much more around
> error handling, specification coordination, dealing
> with versioning and conformance relationships,
> as well as managing through the IETF and W3C processes.
>
> Your help, especially in the last, would be greatly
> appreciated.
>
> Larry
> --
> http://larry.masinter.net
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phillips, Addison [mailto:addison@amazon.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 8:28 AM
> To: Larry Masinter; Lisa Dusseault; Alexey Melnikov
> Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org
> Subject: RE: draft agenda for IRI working group BOF, and draft charter for IRI
>
> Hi Larry,
>
> Historically our W3C Working Group has managed this work, but I don't think we would be opposed to seeing an IETF WG for this purpose.
>
> Addison
>
> Addison Phillips
> Chair -- W3C Internationalization WG
>
> Internationalization is not a feature.
> It is an architecture.
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: uri-request@w3.org [mailto:uri-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of
>> Larry Masinter
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 5:59 AM
>> To: Lisa Dusseault; Alexey Melnikov
>> Subject: draft agenda for IRI working group BOF, and draft charter
>> for IRI
>>
>> (bcc www-tag, public-html, apps-discuss, w3c/ietf policy, idna-
>> update, http-wg&  various individuals)
>>
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-iri/2009Sep/0076.html
>>
>> sent (and further discussion) =>  public-iri@w3.org
>>
>> "While I am still hoping a working group isn't necessary, the
>>   fallback is to start an IETF working group. This message
>>   proposes an agenda for a meeting to form the working group
>>   ("BOF" at IETF 76) and a draft charter...."
>>
>> Larry
>> --
>> http://larry.masinter.net
>>
>>
>

-- 
#-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp   mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
Received on Friday, 9 October 2009 10:56:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 9 October 2009 10:56:13 GMT