W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-core@w3.org > July to September 2009

RE: draft agenda for IRI working group BOF, and draft charter for IRI

From: Phillips, Addison <addison@amazon.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:27:37 -0400
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, Lisa Dusseault <lisa.dusseault@gmail.com>, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
CC: "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C7A5719F1E562149BA9171F58BEE2CA41297D84A35@EX-IAD6-B.ant.amazon.com>
Hi Larry,

Historically our W3C Working Group has managed this work, but I don't think we would be opposed to seeing an IETF WG for this purpose. 

Addison

Addison Phillips
Chair -- W3C Internationalization WG

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: uri-request@w3.org [mailto:uri-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of
> Larry Masinter
> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 5:59 AM
> To: Lisa Dusseault; Alexey Melnikov
> Subject: draft agenda for IRI working group BOF, and draft charter
> for IRI
> 
> (bcc www-tag, public-html, apps-discuss, w3c/ietf policy, idna-
> update, http-wg & various individuals)
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-iri/2009Sep/0076.html

> 
> sent (and further discussion) => public-iri@w3.org
> 
> "While I am still hoping a working group isn't necessary, the
>  fallback is to start an IETF working group. This message
>  proposes an agenda for a meeting to form the working group
>  ("BOF" at IETF 76) and a draft charter...."
> 
> Larry
> --
> http://larry.masinter.net

> 
> 

Received on Wednesday, 23 September 2009 15:28:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 23 September 2009 15:28:29 GMT