On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:12:35 +0100, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org> wrote: > [This thread grew out of one that didn't include www.style, and has since > forked a little. I am therefore pointing to a couple of emails (on the > i18n public list) that didn't reach www.style but that I think are > relevant. I suggest that we henceforth keep both public-i18n and > www-style copied on all emails related to this topic. ] > > See Martin's email at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2009JanMar/0039.html > > See my response at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2009JanMar/0041.html So 1) Do browsers normalize currently? 2) Assuming they do not, who have complained? I may be biased, but I have the feeling that performing Unicode Normalization on code snippets is overkill. It could potentially also make certain class names and IDs identical that are now different/unique. Seems like a bad idea to me. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Friday, 30 January 2009 14:25:23 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 30 January 2009 14:25:24 GMT