On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 20:43:14 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: >> If SVG <title> in text/html does not use RCDATA parsing then it's >> pointless >> to make SVG <script> and <style> use CDATA parsing. > > I don't see how you come to this conclusion? I think the benefits of > parsing <script> and <style> as CDATA is at least as much for authors > as it is for implementations. And authors would benefit just as much > no matter how <title> is handled. If HTML and SVG <style> and <script> are parsed the same, it would IMHO be utterly confusing if the rest of HTML (R)CDATA elements didn't parse the same in both HTML and SVG in text/html. OTOH, if all SVG elements use PCDATA, then at least SVG in text/html is consistent with XML. -- Simon Pieters Opera SoftwareReceived on Friday, 3 April 2009 06:54:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 3 April 2009 06:54:34 GMT