W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-core@w3.org > October to December 2008

[WebCGM2.1][LC Review] i18n comment 5: ISOLatin1

From: <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:28:54 +0000
To: public-webcgm@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Message-Id: <20081111102843.1D2564F341@homer.w3.org>

Comment from the i18n review of:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-webcgm21-20080917/WebCGM21-Config.html#ACI-fontmap

Comment 5
At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0811-webcgm/
Editorial/substantive: E/S
Tracked by: RI

Location in reviewed document:
9.3.2.2 [http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-webcgm21-20080917/WebCGM21-Config.html#ACI-maplist]

Comment: 
 "These normalization rules are applicable for font names specified using the characters of ISOLatin1. They will likely be inapplicable for font names specified using other non-Latin characters."

 
What happens in the case of Latin-2 (Eastern Europe), which is similar to Latin1 but contains a few additional characters. Does a single non-Latin1 character cause normalization to be abandoned for the whole string? 

 
It seems like the only thing that wouldn't apply to all non-Latin1 font names is converting to lower-case, though that is still a relevant consideration for many other Latin characters outside Latin1, and for Armenian, Greek and Cyrillic. Why restrict to Latin1? 

 
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2008 10:28:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 November 2008 10:28:55 GMT