W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-core@w3.org > January to March 2008

RE: [UAX29] i18n comment 5: Definition of EDGCs

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 14:15:42 -0000
To: <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Message-ID: <005c01c8805d$ba7988a0$2f6c99e0$@org>

Fixed.

RI

============
Richard Ishida
Internationalization Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)
 
http://www.w3.org/International/
http://rishida.net/blog/
http://rishida.net/

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-i18n-core-request@w3.org [mailto:public-i18n-core-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of ishida@w3.org
> Sent: 07 March 2008 11:33
> To: public-i18n-core@w3.org
> Subject: [UAX29] i18n comment 5: Definition of EDGCs
> 
> 
> Comment from the i18n review of:
> http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr29/tr29-12.html
> 
> Comment 5
> At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0801-uax29/
> Editorial/substantive: E
> Tracked by: RI
> 
> Location in reviewed document:
> 3.1 [http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr29/tr29-
> 12.html#Default_Grapheme_Cluster_Table]
> 
> Comment:
> "Extended default grapheme clusters should be used in implementations in
> preference to default grapheme clusters, because it provides better
> results for Indic scripts such as Tamil."
> 
> 
> This should come much earlier and be easier to find. We would suggest that
> very near the beginning of section three the document states that it
> defines two types of default grapheme cluster, and that the extended one
> is the preferred.
> 
>  There also needs to be a separate section and heading for the definition
> of XDGCs. The current definition is difficult to find because it is just a
> small adjunct to the section about default grapheme clusters.
Received on Friday, 7 March 2008 14:12:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 1 October 2008 10:18:53 GMT