- From: <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 11:34:59 +0000
- To: public-i18n-core@w3.org
Comment from the i18n review of: http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr29/tr29-12.html Comment 12 At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0801-uax29/ Editorial/substantive: E Tracked by: RI Location in reviewed document: 3 [http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr29/tr29-12.html#Grapheme_Cluster_Boundaries] Comment: The whole of section 3 is written in a way that suggests that default grapheme clusters are the norm, and extended grapheme clusters are a recommended extension. We feel that this the section should be re-edited to make it clear that the extended default grapheme cluster is the standard way to do things in the future, but that you *could* find applications dealing with the former definition. To help with this, we suggest that you find a different word that 'extended' for the name of extended default grapheme clusters, and that you rename default grapheme clusters to something like legacy default grapheme clusters.
Received on Friday, 7 March 2008 11:31:39 UTC