Re: [widgets] i18n

Hi Addison, All,
I've attempted to make the widget spec conformant with BCP437. In
particular, I've deferred searching for localized folders to RFC4647
using "lookup" against a language priority list composed of a basic
language range. WAF would be grateful if (i18n) people could take a
look at the current draft in the spec and make sure that it is ok (so
we can close issue 23 [1]). The i18n text is fairly short (only about
1 page), so it should not take much time to read, and, hopefully,
respond to.

In the widget spec, the localization definitions and author
requirements are described in section:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#localization

The i18n processing model (which makes use of RFC4647) is described in section:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#step-6

Hope it all makes sense.

Looking forward to hearing your feedback,
Marcos

[1] http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/waf/issues/23

-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au

Received on Monday, 19 May 2008 07:10:54 UTC