W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-core@w3.org > April to June 2008

RE: [SSML11] i18n comment 1: Language priority list?

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 20:10:15 +0100
To: <ishida@w3.org>, <dburnett@voxeo.com>, <jim@larson-tech.com>, <ashimura@w3.org>, <scott.mcglashan@hp.com>, <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000001c8b075$fbd34b90$f379e2b0$@org>

My notes from the FTF meeting in Beijing:

It is intentional that all items must match.  Note that xml:lang is not
related to voice.
Failure is handled by voice and inline failure sections.
More text will be added to clarify, an example, and links to other sections.

RI

============
Richard Ishida
Internationalization Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)
 
http://www.w3.org/International/
http://rishida.net/blog/
http://rishida.net/

 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-i18n-core-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-i18n-core-request@w3.org]
> On Behalf Of ishida@w3.org
> Sent: 07 April 2008 16:21
> To: dburnett@voxeo.com; jim@larson-tech.com; ashimura@w3.org;
> scott.mcglashan@hp.com; public-i18n-core@w3.org
> Subject: [SSML11] i18n comment 1: Language priority list?
> 
> 
> Comment from the i18n review of:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-speech-synthesis11-20080317//
> 
> Comment 1
> At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0804-ssml11/Overview.html
> Editorial/substantive: E/S
> Tracked by: RI
> 
> Location in reviewed document:
> 3.2.1 [http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-speech-synthesis11-20080317/#S3.2.1]
> 
> Comment:
> No mention is made of the concept of a 'language priority list' per RFC
4647. We
> suspect that this is an oversight, since we expect that a processor needs
to choose
> one item from the list that best fits, and will need some help in making
that
> choice.
> 
> 
> Furthermore, the text says "A voice satisfies the languages feature if,
for each
> language/accent pair in the list...". We suspect that that should read
'if, for one or
> more language/accent pairs in the list...' The word 'each' implies that
all items in
> the list must match.
> 
> 
> If we are mistaken here, please make it clearer in the spec why this
approach is
> used.
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2008 19:09:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 1 October 2008 10:18:55 GMT