W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-core@w3.org > April to June 2008

Re: [widgets] i18n

From: Mark Davis <mark.davis@icu-project.org>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 09:38:37 -0700
Message-ID: <30b660a20805020938y1e49fa23ldd315e660e8571e9@mail.gmail.com>
To: "David Clarke" <w3@dragonthoughts.co.uk>
Cc: "Marcos Caceres" <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>, public-i18n-core@w3.org, "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
Yes, the references should be to BCP 47, which is a stable number.

Mark

On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 4:42 AM, David Clarke <w3@dragonthoughts.co.uk>
wrote:

>
> Marcos,
>
> Writing personally - not for I18N core
>
> RFC3066 is referenced frequently - it has been superseded by RFC4646 and
> it would be good idea to update the references in your document.
>
> Marcos Caceres wrote:
>
> > Hi i18n Core,
> > Please disregard the i18n model I proposed in my previous email. We
> > have spec'd out a new model [1] (based on model 2 proposed
> > previously). WAF would still be very interested in hearing your
> > thoughts on what we have come up with and also any thoughts you might
> > have about our configuration document format from an i18n perspective.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Marcos
> >
> > [1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#localizatio
> >
> ----
> David Clarke
>
>


-- 
Mark
Received on Friday, 2 May 2008 16:39:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 1 October 2008 10:18:55 GMT