- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:35:14 +0900
- To: Ulrich Nicolas Lissé <xforms-issues@mn.aptest.com>
- CC: www-forms-editor@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
My reply to this issue is the same as to PR#8, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2007JulSep/0086.html . I would propose to discuss PR#8 and PR#13 together in one thread. Felix Ulrich Nicolas Lissé wrote: > Felix, > > due to other last call comments, src was moved from host language control to > XForms, where it is governed by rules of xsd:anyURI from schema 1.0. Since > Schema 1.0 doesn't support IRIs clearly and completely we don't reference the > IRI RFC. > > Regards, > Ulrich Nicolas Lissé > > For the Forms WG > > >> Comment from the i18n review of: >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xforms11-20070222/ >> >> Comment 4 >> At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0704-xforms11/ >> Editorial/substantive: S >> Location in reviewed document: >> 3.2.2 >> Responsibility for useability of IRIs unclear >> >> Comment: >> >> The host language may permit a Linking Attributes Collection to be >> applied to XForms elements as an alternate means of obtaining content >> related to the element. An example is the src attribute from [XHTML 1.0]. >> The schedule by which link traversal occurs is defined by the host >> language. If the link traversal fails, the host language may dispatch >> xforms-link-exception or xforms-link-error to the model associated with >> the in-scope evaluation context node of the element that bears the Linking >> Attributes Collection for the failed link. >> >> Does this mean that the host language is responsible whether XForms allows >> for using >> IRIs [http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3987.txt] >> or not? Please answer this question in the specification and provide a >> reference (normative or informative, depending on the answer) to the IRI >> specification. >> >> >> >> >> >>
Received on Friday, 14 September 2007 00:35:28 UTC