Re: Fwd: Re: HRRIs, IRIs, etc

> >> You should simply drop this effort and use IRI References instead. There
> >> is a high cost associated with yet another notion of resource identifier
> >> technology

> >This is not another notion of resource identifier.  It is the existing
> >notion used for XML system identifier, XLink href, and several other
> >things.  We are merely providing a name and a single place for a
> >definition that already exists in multiple specs.

> If these things are not resource identifiers, then what are they?

I did not mean that they were not resource identifiers.  It was the
"yet another" part that I was disputing.  They are an *existing* form
of resource identifiers, which does not have an name and whose
definition is currently replicated in several places.

-- Richard