Re: nudge concerning XML Schema issue 3245

At 22:56 06/12/05, Fran輟is Yergeau wrote:
>
>Hi Michael,
>
>First an apology for the late reply.
>
>We did discuss your proposal and came to the conclusion that it is a good idea.  Our conclusion was that it doesn't mean dropping early normalization, just recognizing that it cannot be absolutely poerfect and that the Schema proposal can therefore be beneficial.

I haven't been present during the discussion, but I think this is a very
good outcome. In addition, I suggest that something like the above be
added as an explanation to the relevant functions.

Regards,    Martin.



>C. M. Sperberg-McQueen a 馗rit :
>> Dear colleagues,
>> just a quick nudge.  Did you ever find time to discuss the issue
>> described in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2006JulSep/0134.html
>> and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2006JulSep/0172.html
>> -- namely the issue raised against XML Schema 1.1 athttp://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3245
>> ?
>> If so, the rest of the XML Schema Working Group and I would be glad to
>> hear your thoughts.
>> Thanks.
>> Michael Sperberg-McQueen
>> 
>> 
>
>
>


#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp