W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-core@w3.org > October to December 2006


From: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:38:05 +0900
Message-Id: <>
To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>, "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>

The same is true for http://www.ietf.org/rfc/bcp/bcp47.txt.

I suggest we use the one at www.ietf.org. This makes it clear
that it is the IETF that has approved the relevant documents
as BCP. The file at rfc-editor is more 'original' in the sense
that the rfc-editor does a final editing pass (in coordination
with the authors) and publishes the documents, and the IETF
site mirrors them. But this is only after the IETF (in this
case the LTRU WG) creates them and (via the IESG) approves them.

Regards,   Martin.

At 09:15 06/12/13, Felix Sasaki wrote:
>... at http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/bcp/bcp47.txt says now:
>"[Note that this file is a concatenation of more than one RFC.]"
>- Felix

#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp     
Received on Wednesday, 13 December 2006 08:26:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:23:01 UTC